A scientist has claimed the world's leading academic journals reject papers which don't 'support certain narratives' about the issue and instead favor 'distorted' research which hypes up dangers rather than solutions.Patrick T. Brown, a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University and doctor of earth and climate sciences, said editors at Nature and Science - two of the most prestigious scientific journals - select 'climate papers that support certain preapproved narratives'.In an article for , Brown likened the approach to the way 'the press focus so intently on climate change as the root cause' of wildfires, including the recent . He pointed out research that said 80 percent of wildfires are ignited by humans.
Load More
Load More
