If the person who leaked the Supreme Court’s draft opinion striking down Roe v. Wade was seeking to alter any of the justices’ final opinions through public outrage, the move was a bad one, legal experts tell The Post.
“It strikes me that if this leak was done with the intent of affecting justices’ behavior, it strikes me that whoever made that decision was really mistaken,” said Richard Garnett, a professor of freedom of speech, association and religion and constitutional law at Notre Dame.
“I just can’t imagine that there’s any justice who would change his or her vote or position because of this leak,” added Garnett, who clerked for late Chief Justice William Rehnquist in 1996, emphasizing that the possibility is “unlikely.”
Load More
Yorumlar
Kalan Karakter: